[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZctSU2cJHVwPhyhZ@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:28:19 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, michal.kubiak@...el.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
pio.raczynski@...il.com,
Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v1 06/15] ice: add subfunction aux driver support
Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:43:00AM CET, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:27:15AM CET, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
>> >
>> >Instead of only registering devlink port by the ice driver itself,
>> >let PF driver only register port representor for a given subfunction.
>> >Then, aux driver is supposed to register its own devlink instance and
>> >register virtual devlink port.
>> >
>> >Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
>> >---
>> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.c | 52 ++++-
>> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.h | 6 +
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 28 ++-
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.h | 3 +
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 9 +
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.c | 214 ++++++++++++++++--
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.h | 21 ++
>> > 7 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> Could you please split this. I see that you can push out 1-3 patches as
>> preparation.
>
>Do you mean 1-3 patchses from this patch, or from whole patchset? I mean,
This patch.
>do you want to split the patchset to two patchsets? (by splitting patch
Yes, 2 patchsets. If convenient 3. Just do one change per patch so it is
reviewable.
>from the patchset I will have more than netdev maximum; 15 I think).
>
>Thanks,
>Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists