[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZctalmPA/b+VBZC+@mev-dev>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:03:34 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, michal.kubiak@...el.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
pio.raczynski@...il.com,
Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v1 06/15] ice: add subfunction aux driver support
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:28:19PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:43:00AM CET, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:27:15AM CET, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
> >> >
> >> >Instead of only registering devlink port by the ice driver itself,
> >> >let PF driver only register port representor for a given subfunction.
> >> >Then, aux driver is supposed to register its own devlink instance and
> >> >register virtual devlink port.
> >> >
> >> >Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>
> >> >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> >> >---
> >> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.c | 52 ++++-
> >> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.h | 6 +
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 28 ++-
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.h | 3 +
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 9 +
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.c | 214 ++++++++++++++++--
> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.h | 21 ++
> >> > 7 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Could you please split this. I see that you can push out 1-3 patches as
> >> preparation.
> >
> >Do you mean 1-3 patchses from this patch, or from whole patchset? I mean,
>
> This patch.
>
> >do you want to split the patchset to two patchsets? (by splitting patch
>
> Yes, 2 patchsets. If convenient 3. Just do one change per patch so it is
> reviewable.
>
>
Ok, will do that.
> >from the patchset I will have more than netdev maximum; 15 I think).
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists