[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240213100457.6648a8e0@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:04:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
pabeni@...hat.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, weiwan@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Johannes Berg
<johannes.berg@...el.com>, Thomas Weißschuh
<linux@...ssschuh.net>, "open list:TRACING"
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dqs: add NIC stall detector based on
BQL
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:57:49 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Please note that adding other sysfs entries is expensive for workloads
> creating/deleting netdev and netns often.
>
> I _think_ we should find a way for not creating
> /sys/class/net/<interface>/queues/tx-{Q}/byte_queue_limits directory
> and files
> for non BQL enabled devices (like loopback !)
We should try, see if anyone screams. We could use IFF_NO_QUEUE, and
NETIF_F_LLTX as a proxy for "device doesn't have a real queue so BQL
would be pointless"? Obviously better to annotate the drivers which
do have BQL support, but there's >50 of them on a quick count..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists