netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] igc: Add support for LEDs on i225/i226

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11004b9c-97df-fb6f-efb8-9550ea2b6c03@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:05:43 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kurt Kanzenbach
	<kurt@...utronix.de>, <sasha.neftin@...el.com>, Naama Meir
	<naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] igc: Add support for LEDs on i225/i226



On 2/13/2024 12:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
> v3 is still in patchworks:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/list/?series=393838

I think you crossed the URLs. This one is for IWL which is marked as 
Under Review. I would change this to Accepted upon netdev acceptance.

netdev:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=823612&state=*

> State: Awaiting Upstream

For Awaiting Upstream:

"
patch should be reviewed and handled by appropriate sub-maintainer, who 
will send it on to the networking trees; patches set to Awaiting 
upstream in netdev's patchwork will usually remain in this state, 
whether the sub-maintainer requested changes, accepted or rejected the patch
"
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#patch-status

Thanks,
Tony

> Does that mean you? Would not just giving an Acked-by be enough? Now
> we have it twice in patchworks, and you did not mark your version as
> v4, so is there a danger we get the different versions mixed up?
> 
>      Andrew
>