[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fba9018d-3783-4d3c-8948-409d7d5258d5@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:09:08 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] dma: compile-out DMA sync op calls when
not used
On 2024-02-14 4:21 pm, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
[...]
> +static inline bool dma_skip_sync(const struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_NEED_SYNC);
> +}
One more thing, could we please also make this conditional on
!CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG so that that doesn't lose coverage for validating
syncs?
Thanks,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists