[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <680bd25a-8bf1-4af6-b2bb-e5a11daf287d@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:50:47 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Thinh Tran <thinhtr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <manishc@...vell.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <skalluru@...vell.com>, <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <VENKATA.SAI.DUGGI@....com>, <drc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<abdhalee@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] net/bnx2x: refactor common code to
bnx2x_stop_nic()
On 2/13/2024 10:32 AM, Thinh Tran wrote:
> Refactor common code which disables and releases HW interrupts, deletes
> NAPI objects, into a new bnx2x_stop_nic() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thinh Tran <thinhtr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
Good cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> +void bnx2x_stop_nic(struct bnx2x *bp, int disable_hw)
> +{
> + if (!bp->nic_stopped) {
> + /* Disable HW interrupts, NAPI */
> + bnx2x_netif_stop(bp, disable_hw);
> + /* Delete all NAPI objects */
> + bnx2x_del_all_napi(bp);
> + if (CNIC_LOADED(bp))
> + bnx2x_del_all_napi_cnic(bp);
> + /* Release IRQs */
> + bnx2x_free_irq(bp);
> + bp->nic_stopped = true;
> + }
> +}
IMHO this could be an early return:
if (bp->nic_stopped)
return;
That is a bit of a nitpick and the existing code (by necessity of not
being a function) used this style.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists