netdev - [PATCH net-next] selftests: bonding: make sure new active is not null

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:21:28 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Liang Li <liali@...hat.com>,
	Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] selftests: bonding: make sure new active is not null

One of Jakub's tests[1] shows that there may be period all ports
are down and no active slave. This makes the new_active_slave null
and the test fails. Add a check to make sure the new active is not null.

 [  189.051966] br0: port 2(s1) entered disabled state
 [  189.317881] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely down, disabling slave
 [  189.318487] bond0: (slave eth2): making interface the new active one
 [  190.435430] br0: port 4(s2) entered disabled state
 [  190.773786] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely down, disabling slave
 [  190.774204] bond0: (slave eth2): link status definitely down, disabling slave
 [  190.774715] bond0: now running without any active interface!
 [  190.877760] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely up
 [  190.878098] bond0: (slave eth0): making interface the new active one
 [  190.878495] bond0: active interface up!
 [  191.802872] br0: port 4(s2) entered blocking state
 [  191.803157] br0: port 4(s2) entered forwarding state
 [  191.813756] bond0: (slave eth2): link status definitely up
 [  192.847095] br0: port 2(s1) entered blocking state
 [  192.847396] br0: port 2(s1) entered forwarding state
 [  192.853740] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely up
 # TEST: prio (active-backup ns_ip6_target primary_reselect 1)         [FAIL]
 # Current active slave is null but not eth0

[1] https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-bonding/results/464481/1-bond-options-sh/stdout

Fixes: 45bf79bc56c4 ("selftests: bonding: reduce garp_test/arp_validate test time")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
index 6fd0cff3e1e9..644ea5769e81 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ active_slave_changed()
 	local old_active_slave=$1
 	local new_active_slave=$(cmd_jq "ip -n ${s_ns} -d -j link show bond0" \
 				".[].linkinfo.info_data.active_slave")
-	test "$old_active_slave" != "$new_active_slave"
+	[ "$new_active_slave" != "$old_active_slave" -a "$new_active_slave" != "null" ]
 }
 
 check_active_slave()
 {
 	local target_active_slave=$1
-	slowwait 2 active_slave_changed $active_slave
+	slowwait 5 active_slave_changed $active_slave
 	active_slave=$(cmd_jq "ip -n ${s_ns} -d -j link show bond0" ".[].linkinfo.info_data.active_slave")
 	test "$active_slave" = "$target_active_slave"
 	check_err $? "Current active slave is $active_slave but not $target_active_slave"
-- 
2.43.0