[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zcy9E4riyFRk8B1P@herburgerg-w2>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:20:37 +0100
From: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...tq-group.com>
To: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 05/14] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: add driver
for the Marvell 88Q2220 PHY
Hi Dimitri,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> static struct phy_driver mv88q2xxx_driver[] = {
> {
> .phy_id = MARVELL_PHY_ID_88Q2110,
> @@ -255,12 +439,26 @@ static struct phy_driver mv88q2xxx_driver[] = {
> .get_sqi = mv88q2xxx_get_sqi,
> .get_sqi_max = mv88q2xxx_get_sqi_max,
> },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(PHY_ID_88Q2220_REVB0),
I tested the series on a 88Q2220 REV B1 (which is id 0x002b0b22). The
driver works fine on this revision.
I understand that in the Marvell API the initialization for Rev B0 and
B1 differ. For B0 some additional init sequence is executed. I did not look
into the details of this sequence. However this patch seems to work on
Rev B1.
Would you consider adding compatibility for Rev B1 and following? I
tested with:
.phy_id = MARVELL_PHY_ID_88Q2220,
.phy_id_mask = MARVELL_PHY_ID_MASK,
Otherwise:
Tested-by: Gregor Herburger <gregor.herburger@...tq-group.com>
Best regards
Gregor
--
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists