[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKa-r6vwCpK0ZcoaFgQtdFaQ15_RF0zE+jR0_NoZdwg9D1ybbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:55:57 +0100
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_mirred: use the backlog for mirred ingress
hi,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 1:31 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
[...]
> > If I well read, Jakub's patch [1] uses the backlog for egress->ingress
> > regardless of the "nest level": no more calls to netif_receive_skb():
> > It's the same as my initial proposal for fixing the OVS soft-lockup [2],
> > the code is different because now we have tcf_mirred_to_dev().
>
> FWIW feel free to add your Sob or Co-dev+Sob!
> It is very much the same solution as what you posted at some stage.
I'm ok with the current tags! thanks!
--
davide
Powered by blists - more mailing lists