netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] tcp: add support for SO_PEEK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zc2CCXkGnrdnm_Bh@zatzit>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:16:25 +1100
From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kuba@...nel.org, passt-dev@...st.top,
	sbrivio@...hat.com, lvivier@...hat.com, dgibson@...hat.com,
	jmaloy@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 04:41:14AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:34 AM David Gibson
> <david@...son.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > BTW I see the man pages say SO_PEEK_OFF is "is currently supported
> > > only for unix(7) sockets"
> >
> > Yes, this patch is explicitly aiming to change that.
> 
> I was pointing out that UDP is supposed to support it already, since 2016,
> the manpage should mention UDP already.

Oh, sorry, I misunderstood.  I tend to forget about this applied to
datagram sockets, since we have no use for that.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)