[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a8d100c-57a5-4c92-b744-453c106352ad@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:13:45 +0530
From: "Karumanchi, Vineeth" <vineeth.karumanchi@....com>
To: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: macb: queue tie-off or disable during
WOL suspend
Hi Claudiu,
On 2/3/2024 9:08 PM, claudiu beznea wrote:
<...>
>> queue->tx_skb = NULL;
>> @@ -2568,6 +2574,16 @@ static int macb_alloc_consistent(struct macb *bp)
>> if (bp->macbgem_ops.mog_alloc_rx_buffers(bp))
>> goto out_err;
>>
>> + /* Required for tie off descriptor for PM cases */
>> + if (!(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_QUEUE_DISABLE)) {
>> + bp->rx_ring_tieoff = dma_alloc_coherent(&bp->pdev->dev,
>> + macb_dma_desc_get_size(bp),
>> + &bp->rx_ring_tieoff_dma,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!bp->rx_ring_tieoff)
>> + goto out_err;
> You also need to free the previously allocated rx buffers.
Are you referring to (bp->macbgem_ops.mog_alloc_rx_buffers(bp)) allocation ?
It was freed in macb_free_consistent():
...
bp->macbgem_ops.mog_free_rx_buffers(bp);
...
Please let me know if you are referring to different buffers.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
--
🙏 vineeth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists