lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b244b8ef-9a30-42dc-b9e8-a9d35cce99a3@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:11:36 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...mail.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] net: hisi-femac: add support for Hi3798MV200,
 remove unmaintained compatibles

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:38:31PM +0800, Yang Xiwen wrote:
> On 2/16/2024 9:37 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:01:59PM +0800, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - replace email.
> > > - hisi-femac: s/BUS/MACIF (Andrew Lunn)
> > > - hisi-femac: add "hisilicon,hisi-femac" compatible since the driver
> > >    seems generic enough for various SoCs
> > > - hisi-femac-mdio: convert binding to YAML (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
> > > - rewrite commit logs (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
> > > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240216-net-v1-0-e0ad972cda99@outlook.com
> > Generally, you wait for discussion to finish before posting a new
> > version. Also, netdev requests you wait a minimum of 24 hours between
> > versions.
> > 
> > Having discussion happening on two different versions of a patchset
> > at once just causes confusion.
> Sorry for that, it's the first time i send netdev patches.

Reading this might help you:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ