netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: hisi_femac: remove unused compatible strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SEZPR06MB6959A0CCF11F3E4FC956028A964C2@SEZPR06MB6959.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 04:09:22 +0800
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Salil Mehta
 <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...mail.com>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: hisi_femac: remove unused compatible strings

On 2/17/2024 4:05 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:01:08PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> For me, it's a bit lucky to find a (partially) working driver in mainline.
>>> It'll take me even more time if no mainline driver is available. In fact, i
>>> wrote the driver for mainline u-boot from scratch and it has been merged. So
>>> it's good to have this binding accepted unmodified, or i'll have to modify
>>> u-boot side driver code to keep them sync.
>> Sorry, but that is not how it works. If during review we decided it
>> needs to be modified, you will need to modify it.
>>
>> I would suggest you first mainstream bindings to the kernel, because
>> it has active DT maintainers how really care about bindings. Then get
>> is merged to u-boot.
> Just to note, the U-Boot folk are currently working on a model where
> they will be importing the kernel's dts files directly into their tree
> along with the bindings. I think they're adding dtbs_check too.
> Although that will be opt-in per board, it does point to an increased
> desire for compliance there too, which is great.

Of course. I'll sync this stuff back to u-boot once this gets accepted 
and merged. I begin working from u-boot simply because the Driver Model 
of U-Boot is much simpler than Linux's. I wrote the driver for U-Boot 
first to figure out how the hardware is working, then port it to Linux.

-- 
Regards,
Yang Xiwen