[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240217010017.88921-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:00:17 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: <alexander@...alicyn.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuniyu@...zon.com>, <leitao@...ian.org>, <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:22:23 -0800
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
>
> Avoid the following false positive warning with future changes to
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 3068) of destination "&nsk->__sk_common.skc_dontcopy_end" at net/core/sock.c:2057 (size 0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>
> v2- add inet_reqsk_clone() instance too
> v1- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240216204423.work.066-kees@kernel.org/
> ---
> net/core/sock.c | 5 +++--
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 0a7f46c37f0c..b7ea358eb18f 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2053,8 +2053,9 @@ static void sock_copy(struct sock *nsk, const struct sock *osk)
>
> memcpy(nsk, osk, offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
>
> - memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> - prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
> + unsafe_memcpy(&nsk->sk_dontcopy_end, &osk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> + prot->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
> + /* alloc is larger than struct, see sk_prot_alloc() */);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK
> nsk->sk_security = sptr;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 459af1f89739..4a1d96ba3ad1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -906,8 +906,9 @@ static struct request_sock *inet_reqsk_clone(struct request_sock *req,
>
> memcpy(nreq_sk, req_sk,
> offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_begin));
> - memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> - req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end));
> + unsafe_memcpy(&nreq_sk->sk_dontcopy_end, &req_sk->sk_dontcopy_end,
> + req->rsk_ops->obj_size - offsetof(struct sock, sk_dontcopy_end),
> + /* alloc is larger than struct, see sk_prot_alloc() */);
nit: reqsk is allocated in inet_reqsk_clone().
>
> sk_node_init(&nreq_sk->sk_node);
> nreq_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping = req_sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists