netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] selftests: vxlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:25:13 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
	petrm@...dia.com, lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] selftests: vxlan_mdb: Add MDB bulk deletion
 test

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 01:54:32PM +0800, Yujie Liu wrote:
> Hi Ido,
> 
> I'm from the kernel test robot team. We noticed that this patch
> introduced a new group of flush tests. The bot cannot parse the test
> result correctly due to some duplicate output in the summary, such
> as the following ones marked by arrows:

[...]

> Althought we can walkaround this problem at the bot side, we would still
> like to consult you about whether it is expected or by design to have the
> duplicate test descriptions, and is it possible to give them different
> descriptions to clearly tell them apart? Could you please give us
> some guidance?

Thanks for the report. Wasn't aware of this limitation. Will take care
of it later this week (AFK tomorrow) and copy you on the patch.