[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4cddd9f-9d76-43b7-9091-413f923d27f2@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:14:36 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Liam Girdwood
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] power: sequencing: implement the subsystem and
add first users
On 18/02/2024 13:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 22:33, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>
>> First, I'd like to apologize for the somewhat chaotic previous iterations
>> of this series and improper versioning which was rightfully pointed out
>> to me. I figured that the scope changed so much that it didn't make sense
>> to consider previous submissions part of the same series as the original
>> RFC but others thought otherwise so this one becomes v5 and I'll keep the
>> versioning going forward.
>>
>> This is the summary of the work so far:
>>
>> v1: Original RFC:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240104130123.37115-1-brgl@bgdev.pl/T/
>>
>> v2: First real patch series (should have been PATCH v2) adding what I
>> referred to back then as PCI power sequencing:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/2024021413-grumbling-unlivable-c145@gregkh/T/
>>
>> v3: RFC for the DT representation of the PMU supplying the WLAN and BT
>> modules inside the QCA6391 package (was largely separate from the
>> series but probably should have been called PATCH or RFC v3):
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMRc=Mc+GNoi57eTQg71DXkQKjdaoAmCpB=h2ndEpGnmdhVV-Q@mail.gmail.com/T/
>>
>> v4: Second attempt at the full series with changed scope (introduction of
>> the pwrseq subsystem, should have been RFC v4)
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240201155532.49707-1-brgl@bgdev.pl/T/
>>
>> ===
>>
>> With that out of the way, I'd like to get down to explaining the two
>> problems I'm trying to solve.
>>
>> Problem statement #1: Dynamic bus chicken-and-egg problem.
>>
>> Certain on-board PCI devices need to be powered up before they are can be
>> detected but their PCI drivers won't get bound until the device is
>> powered-up so enabling the relevant resources in the PCI device driver
>> itself is impossible.
>>
>> Problem statement #2: Sharing inter-dependent resources between devices.
>>
>> Certain devices that use separate drivers (often on different busses)
>> share resources (regulators, clocks, etc.). Typically these resources
>> are reference-counted but in some cases there are additional interactions
>> between them to consider, for example specific power-up sequence timings.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> The reason for tackling both of these problems in a single series is the
>> fact the the platform I'm working on - Qualcomm RB5 - deals with both and
>> both need to be addressed in order to enable WLAN and Bluetooth support
>> upstream.
>>
>> The on-board WLAN/BT package - QCA6391 - has a Power Management Unit that
>> takes inputs from the host and exposes LDO outputs consumed by the BT and
>> WLAN modules which can be powered-up and down independently. However
>> a delay of 100ms must be respected between enabling the BT- and
>> WLAN-enable GPIOs[*].
>>
>> ===
>>
>> This series is logically split into several sections. I'll go
>> patch-by-patch and explain each step.
>>
>> Patch 1/18:
>>
>> This is a commit taken from the list by Jonathan Cameron that adds
>> a __free() helper for OF nodes. Not strictly related to the series but
>> until said commit ends in next, I need to carry it with this series.
>>
>> Patch 2/18:
>>
>> This enables the ath12k PCI module in arm64 defconfig as Qualcomm sm8650
>> and sm8550 reference platforms use it in the WCN7850 module.
>>
>> Patches 3/18-6/18:
>>
>> These contain all relevant DT bindings changes. We add new documents for
>> the QCA6390 PMU and ATH12K devices as well as extend the bindings for the
>> Qualcomm Bluetooth and ATH11K modules with regulators used by them in
>> QCA6390.
>>
>> Patches 7/18-9/18:
>>
>> These contain changes to device-tree sources for the three platforms we
>> work with in this series. As the WCN7850 module doesn't require any
>> specific timings introducing dependencies between the Bluetooth and WLAN
>> modules, while the QCA6390 does, we take two different approaches to how
>> me model them in DT.
>>
>> For WCN7850 we hide the existence of the PMU as modeling it is simply not
>> necessary. The BT and WLAN devices on the device-tree are represented as
>> consuming the inputs (relevant to the functionality of each) of the PMU
>> directly.
>
> We are describing the hardware. From the hardware point of view, there
> is a PMU. I think at some point we would really like to describe all
> Qualcomm/Atheros WiFI+BT units using this PMU approach, including the
> older ath10k units present on RB3 (WCN3990) and db820c (QCA6174).
While I agree with older WiFi+BT units, I don't think it's needed for
WCN7850 since BT+WiFi are now designed to be fully independent and PMU is
transparent.
>
>> For QCA6390 on RB5 we add the PMU node as a platform device. It consumes
>> regulators and GPIOs from the host and exposed regulators consumer in turn
>> by the BT and WLAN modules. This represents the internal structure of the
>> package.
>>
>> Patches 10/18-14/18:
>>
>> These contain the bulk of the PCI changes for this series. We introduce
>> a simple framework for powering up PCI devices before detecting them on
>> the bus and the first user of this library in the form of the WCN7850 PCI
>> power control driver.
>>
>> The general approach is as follows: PCI devices that need special
>> treatment before they can be powered up, scanned and bound to their PCI
>> drivers must be described on the device-tree as child nodes of the PCI
>> port node. These devices will be instantiated on the platform bus. They
>> will in fact be generic platform devices with the compatible of the form
>> used for PCI devices already upstream ("pci<vendor ID>,<device ID">). We
>> add a new directory under drivers/pci/pwrctl/ that contains PCI pwrctl
>> drivers. These drivers are platform drivers that will now be matched
>> against the devices instantiated from port children just like any other
>> platform pairs.
>>
>> Both the power control platform device *AND* the associated PCI device
>> reuse the same OF node and have access to the same properties. The goal
>> of the platform driver is to request and bring up any required resources
>> and let the pwrctl framework know that it's now OK to rescan the bus and
>> detect the devices. When the device is bound, we are notified about it
>> by the PCI bus notifier event and can establish a device link between the
>> power control device and the PCI device so that any future extension for
>> power-management will already be able to work with the correct hierachy.
>>
>> The reusing of the OF node is the reason for the small changes to the PCI
>> OF core: as the bootloader can possibly leave the relevant regulators on
>> before booting linux, the PCI device can be detected before its platform
>> abstraction is probed. In this case, we find that device first and mark
>> its OF node as reused. The pwrctl framework handles the opposite case
>> (when the PCI device is detected only after the platform driver
>> successfully enabled it).
>>
>> Patches 15/18-16/18:
>>
>> These add a relatively simple power sequencing subsystem and the first
>> driver using it: the pwrseq module for the QCA6390 PMU.
>>
>> For the record: Bjorn suggested a different solution: a regulator driver
>> that would - based on which regulators are enabled by a consumer - enable
>> relevant resources (drive the enable GPIOs) while respecting the
>> HW-specific delays. This would however require significant and yet
>> unprecised changed to the regulator subsystem as well as be an abuse of
>> the regulator provider API akin to using the reset framework for power
>> sequencing as proposed before.
>>
>> Instead I'm proposing to add a subsystem that allows different devices to
>> use a shared power sequence split into consumer-specific as well as
>> common "units".
>>
>> A power sequence provider driver registers a set of units with pwrseq
>> core. Each unit can be enabled and disabled and contains an optional list
>> of other units which must be enabled before it itself can be. A unit
>> represents a discreet chunk of the power sequence.
>>
>> It also registers a list of targets: a target is an abstraction wrapping
>> a unit which allows consumers to tell pwrseq which unit they want to
>> reach. Real-life example is the driver we're adding here: there's a set
>> of common regulators, two PCIe-specific ones and two enable GPIOs: one
>> for Bluetooth and one for WLAN.
>>
>> The Bluetooth driver requests a descriptor to the power sequencer and
>> names the target it wants to reach:
>>
>> pwrseq = devm_pwrseq_get(dev, "bluetooth");
>
> Is this target tied to the device or not? If not, this might become a
> limitation, if somebody installs two WiFi/BT modules to a single
> device.
>
>> The pwrseq core then knows that when the driver calls:
>>
>> pwrseq_power_on(pwrseq);
>>
>> It must enable the "bluetooth-enable" unit but it depends on the
>> "regulators-common" unit so this one is enabled first. The provider
>> driver is also in charge of assuring an appropriate delay between
>> enabling the BT and WLAN enable GPIOs. The WLAN-specific resources are
>> handled by the "wlan-enable" unit and so are not enabled until the WLAN
>> driver requests the "wlan" target to be powered on.
>>
>> Another thing worth discussing is the way we associate the consumer with
>> the relevant power sequencer. DT maintainers have expressed a discontent
>> with the existing mmc pwrseq bindings and have NAKed an earlier
>> initiative to introduce global pwrseq bindings to the kernel[1].
>>
>> In this approach, we model the existing regulators and GPIOs in DT but
>> the pwrseq subsystem requires each provider to provide a .match()
>> callback. Whenever a consumer requests a power sequencer handle, we
>> iterate over the list of pwrseq drivers and call .match() for each. It's
>> up to the driver to verify in a platform-specific way whether it deals
>> with its consumer and let the core pwrseq code know.
>
> This looks really nice, it will allow us to migrate the BT driver to
> always use pwrseq instead of regulators without touching the DT.
>
>>
>> The advantage of this over reusing the regulator or reset subsystem is
>> that it's more generalized and can handle resources of all kinds as well
>> as deal with any kind of power-on sequences: for instance, Qualcomm has
>> a PCI switch they want a driver for but this switch requires enabling
>> some resources first (PCI pwrctl) and then configuring the device over
>> I2C (which can be handled by the pwrseq provider).
>>
>> Patch 17/18:
>>
>> This patch makes the Qualcomm Bluetooth driver get and use the power
>> sequencer for QCA6390.
>>
>> Patch 18/18:
>>
>> While tiny, this patch is possibly the highlight of the entire series.
>> It uses the two abstraction layers we introduced before to create an
>> elegant power sequencing PCI power control driver and supports the ath11k
>> module on QCA6390.
>>
>> With this series we can now enable BT and WLAN on several new Qualcomm
>> boards upstream.
>>
>> I tested the series on RB5 while Neil tested it on sm8650-qrd and
>> sm8550-qrd.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Bartosz Golaszewski
>>
>> It's hard to list the changes between versions here as the scope changed
>> significantly between each iteration and some versions were not even full
>> series but rather RFCs for parts of the solution. For this reason, I'll
>> only start listing changes starting from v6.
>>
>> [*] This is what the docs say. In practice it seems that this delay can be
>> ignored. However the subsequent model - QCA6490 - *does* require users to
>> respect it, so the problem remains valid.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210829131305.534417-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/
>>
>> Bartosz Golaszewski (15):
>> arm64: defconfig: enable ath12k as a module
>> dt-bindings: regulator: describe the PMU module of the QCA6390 package
>> dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: qualcomm: describe regulators for QCA6390
>> dt-bindings: new: wireless: qcom,ath11k: describe the ath11k on
>> QCA6390
>> dt-bindings: new: wireless: describe the ath12k PCI module
>> arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: model the PMU of the QCA6391
>> PCI: hold the rescan mutex when scanning for the first time
>> PCI/pwrctl: reuse the OF node for power controlled devices
>> PCI/pwrctl: create platform devices for child OF nodes of the port
>> node
>> PCI/pwrctl: add PCI power control core code
>> PCI/pwrctl: add a power control driver for WCN7850
>> power: sequencing: implement the pwrseq core
>> power: pwrseq: add a driver for the QCA6390 PMU module
>> Bluetooth: qca: use the power sequencer for QCA6390
>> PCI/pwrctl: add a PCI power control driver for power sequenced devices
>>
>> Jonathan Cameron (1):
>> of: Add cleanup.h based auto release via __free(device_node) markings.
>>
>> Neil Armstrong (2):
>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550-qrd: add the Wifi node
>> arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650-qrd: add the Wifi node
>>
>> .../net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 17 +
>> .../net/wireless/qcom,ath11k-pci.yaml | 28 +
>> .../net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-pci.yaml | 103 ++
>> .../bindings/regulator/qcom,qca6390-pmu.yaml | 166 +++
>> MAINTAINERS | 8 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb5165-rb5.dts | 123 +-
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 10 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-qrd.dts | 37 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 10 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650-qrd.dts | 29 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 10 +
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 31 +
>> drivers/pci/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/pci/bus.c | 9 +-
>> drivers/pci/of.c | 14 +-
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +
>> drivers/pci/pwrctl/Kconfig | 25 +
>> drivers/pci/pwrctl/Makefile | 7 +
>> drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c | 136 +++
>> drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c | 84 ++
>> drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-wcn7850.c | 202 ++++
>> drivers/pci/remove.c | 2 +
>> drivers/power/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/power/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig | 28 +
>> drivers/power/sequencing/Makefile | 6 +
>> drivers/power/sequencing/core.c | 1065 +++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qca6390.c | 353 ++++++
>> include/linux/of.h | 2 +
>> include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h | 51 +
>> include/linux/pwrseq/consumer.h | 56 +
>> include/linux/pwrseq/provider.h | 75 ++
>> 34 files changed, 2678 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-pci.yaml
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,qca6390-pmu.yaml
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pwrctl/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pwrctl/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-wcn7850.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/sequencing/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/sequencing/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/sequencing/core.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qca6390.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/pwrseq/consumer.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/pwrseq/provider.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists