netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v1 2/2] ice: tc: allow ip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZdSluDkqY1R4CMBq@mev-dev>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:14:32 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, wojciech.drewek@...el.com,
	marcin.szycik@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>,
	sridhar.samudrala@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-next v1 2/2] ice: tc: allow ip_proto
 matching

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 01:26:34PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Michal,
> 
> 
> Thank you for the patch. Some minor nits from my side.
> 
> Am 20.02.24 um 11:59 schrieb Michal Swiatkowski:
> > Add new matching type. There is no encap version of ip_proto field.
> 
> Excuse my ignorance, I do not understand the second sentence. Is an encap
> version going to be added?
> 

No, I will rephrase it, thanks.

> > Use it in the same lookup type as for TTL. In hardware it have the same
> 
> s/have/has/
>

Will fix.

> > protocol ID, but different offset.
> > 
> > Example command to add filter with ip_proto:
> > $tc filter add dev eth10 ingress protocol ip flower ip_proto icmp \
> >   skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev eth0
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.h |  1 +
> >   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
> > index 49ed5fd7db10..f7c0f62fb730 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.c
> > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ice_tc_count_lkups(u32 flags, struct ice_tc_flower_lyr_2_4_hdrs *headers,
> >   		     ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_DEST_IPV6 | ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_SRC_IPV6))
> >   		lkups_cnt++;
> > -	if (flags & (ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TOS | ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TTL))
> > +	if (flags & (ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TOS | ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TTL |
> > +		     ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_PROTO))
> 
> Should this be sorted? (Also below).
>

Do you mean PROTO before TOS and TTL? I like the current order, because
for ipv6 we don't have PROTO, but we have TOS and TTL, it looks better
when PROTO is as additional one here.

> >   		lkups_cnt++;
> >   	/* are L2TPv3 options specified? */
> > @@ -530,7 +531,8 @@ ice_tc_fill_rules(struct ice_hw *hw, u32 flags,
> >   	}
> >   	if (headers->l2_key.n_proto == htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> > -	    (flags & (ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TOS | ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TTL))) {
> > +	    (flags & (ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TOS | ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TTL |
> > +		      ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_PROTO))) {
> >   		list[i].type = ice_proto_type_from_ipv4(inner);
> >   		if (flags & ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_TOS) {
> > @@ -545,6 +547,13 @@ ice_tc_fill_rules(struct ice_hw *hw, u32 flags,
> >   				headers->l3_mask.ttl;
> >   		}
> > +		if (flags & ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_PROTO) {
> > +			list[i].h_u.ipv4_hdr.protocol =
> > +				headers->l3_key.ip_proto;
> > +			list[i].m_u.ipv4_hdr.protocol =
> > +				headers->l3_mask.ip_proto;
> 
> (Strange to break the line each time, but seems to be the surrounding coding
> style.)
>

Yeah, without breaking it is longer than 80.

> > +		}
> > +
> >   		i++;
> >   	}
> > @@ -1515,7 +1524,11 @@ ice_parse_cls_flower(struct net_device *filter_dev, struct ice_vsi *vsi,
> >   		headers->l2_key.n_proto = cpu_to_be16(n_proto_key);
> >   		headers->l2_mask.n_proto = cpu_to_be16(n_proto_mask);
> > +
> > +		if (match.key->ip_proto)
> > +			fltr->flags |= ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_PROTO;
> >   		headers->l3_key.ip_proto = match.key->ip_proto;
> > +		headers->l3_mask.ip_proto = match.mask->ip_proto;
> >   	}
> >   	if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS)) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.h
> > index 65d387163a46..856f371d0687 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_tc_lib.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >   #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_VLAN_PRIO		BIT(27)
> >   #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_CVLAN_PRIO		BIT(28)
> >   #define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_VLAN_TPID		BIT(29)
> > +#define ICE_TC_FLWR_FIELD_IP_PROTO		BIT(30)
> >   #define ICE_TC_FLOWER_MASK_32   0xFFFFFFFF
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul

Thanks,
Michal