[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877ciz59hi.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:30:33 -0800
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
kurt@...utronix.de, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iwl-net v1 2/2] igb: Fix missing time sync events
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 07:05:07AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
>
>> Does setting ICR.Time_Sync[TXTS] also clear ICR.Time_Sync[RXTS] ?
>>
>> That is what you seem to be saying.
>
> Okay, so you really mean that if the _same_ bit becomes set between
> the read and the acknowledgment, then that event will be missed,
> right?
>
Yeah, I will reword the commit messages so it's clearer that it's the
same bit.
> In that case, thank you for fixing this more than nine year old bug!
>
> Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
>
>
Thank you,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists