[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <631d6b12-fb5c-3074-3770-d6927aea393d@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:39:47 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Change BPF_TEST_RUN use the system page pool
for live XDP frames
On 2/19/24 7:52 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> Now that we have a system-wide page pool, we can use that for the live
>> frame mode of BPF_TEST_RUN (used by the XDP traffic generator), and
>> avoid the cost of creating a separate page pool instance for each
>> syscall invocation. See the individual patches for more details.
>>
>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (3):
>> net: Register system page pool as an XDP memory model
>> bpf: test_run: Use system page pool for XDP live frame mode
>> bpf: test_run: Fix cacheline alignment of live XDP frame data
>> structures
>>
>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
>> net/bpf/test_run.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> net/core/dev.c | 13 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> Hi maintainers
>
> This series is targeting net-next, but it's listed as delegate:bpf in
> patchwork[0]; is that a mistake? Do I need to do anything more to nudge it
> along?
I moved it over to netdev, it would be good next time if there are dependencies
which are in net-next but not yet bpf-next to clearly state them given from this
series the majority touches the bpf test infra code.
> -Toke
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=826384
Powered by blists - more mailing lists