lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1854a99-d0fd-4b96-875a-ef9be2b96f04@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:08:03 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
 alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
 chenhuacai@...ngson.cn, linux@...linux.org.uk, guyinggang@...ngson.cn,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 03/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Add full
 PCI support


在 2024/2/6 00:49, Serge Semin 写道:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:43:23PM +0800, Yanteng Si wrote:
>> Current dwmac-loongson only support LS2K in the "probed with PCI and
>> configured with DT" manner. Add LS7A support on which the devices are
>> fully PCI (non-DT).
> Please add to the commit log more details of what LS7A is like and
> bind that description to the changes below like the interface
> settings, ref and PTP clock settings, etc. What is the difference
> between LS2K and LS7A?
OK,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>>   .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c  | 79 +++++++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> index e2dcb339b8b0..979c9b6dab3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ struct stmmac_pci_info {
>>   static void loongson_default_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   				  struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
>>   {
>> +	/* Get bus_id, this can be overloaded later */
>> +	plat->bus_id = (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) << 16) |
>> +		       PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
>> +
>>   	plat->clk_csr = 2;	/* clk_csr_i = 20-35MHz & MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
>>   	plat->has_gmac = 1;
>>   	plat->force_sf_dma_mode = 1;
>> @@ -51,10 +55,14 @@ static int loongson_gmac_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	plat->mdio_bus_data->phy_mask = 0;
>>   
>>   	plat->phy_addr = -1;
>> +	plat->phy_interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID;
>>   
>>   	plat->dma_cfg->pbl = 32;
>>   	plat->dma_cfg->pblx8 = true;
>>   
>> +	plat->clk_ref_rate = 125000000;
>> +	plat->clk_ptp_rate = 125000000;
>> +
> Is this compatible with the LS2K GMAC?
Of course!
>
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -71,13 +79,6 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	struct stmmac_resources res;
>>   	struct device_node *np;
>>   
>> -	np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>> -
>> -	if (!np) {
>> -		pr_info("dwmac_loongson_pci: No OF node\n");
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	plat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	if (!plat)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	if (!plat->dma_cfg)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> +	np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>>   	plat->mdio_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
>>   	if (plat->mdio_node) {
>>   		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found MDIO subnode\n");
> Shouldn't mdio_node setup being done under the "if (np)" clause?
Yes, they will be moved there.
>
>> @@ -123,41 +125,48 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto err_disable_device;
>>   
>> -	bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "ethernet");
>> -	if (bus_id >= 0)
>> -		plat->bus_id = bus_id;
>> +	if (np) {
>> +		bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "ethernet");
>> +		if (bus_id >= 0)
>> +			plat->bus_id = bus_id;
>>   
>> -	phy_mode = device_get_phy_mode(&pdev->dev);
>> -	if (phy_mode < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "phy_mode not found\n");
>> -		ret = phy_mode;
>> -		goto err_disable_device;
>> +		phy_mode = device_get_phy_mode(&pdev->dev);
>> +		if (phy_mode < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "phy_mode not found\n");
>> +			ret = phy_mode;
>> +			goto err_disable_device;
>> +		}
>> +		plat->phy_interface = phy_mode;
>>   	}
> Please collect all OF-specific code in the same "if (np)" clause if
> possible.
OK,
>
>>   
>> -	plat->phy_interface = phy_mode;	np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>> -
>>   	pci_enable_msi(pdev);
>>   	memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res));
>>   	res.addr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[0];
>>   
>> -	res.irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "macirq");
>> -	if (res.irq < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ macirq not found\n");
>> -		ret = -ENODEV;
>> -		goto err_disable_msi;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	res.wol_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_wake_irq");
>> -	if (res.wol_irq < 0) {
>> -		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_wake_irq not found, using macirq\n");
>> -		res.wol_irq = res.irq;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	res.lpi_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_lpi");
>> -	if (res.lpi_irq < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>> -		ret = -ENODEV;
>> -		goto err_disable_msi;
>> +	if (np) {
>> +		res.irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "macirq");
>> +		if (res.irq < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ macirq not found\n");
>> +			ret = -ENODEV;
>> +			goto err_disable_msi;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		res.wol_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_wake_irq");
>> +		if (res.wol_irq < 0) {
>> +			dev_info(&pdev->dev,
>> +				 "IRQ eth_wake_irq not found, using macirq\n");
>> +			res.wol_irq = res.irq;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		res.lpi_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_lpi");
>> +		if (res.lpi_irq < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>> +			ret = -ENODEV;
>> +			goto err_disable_msi;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		res.irq = pdev->irq;
>> +		res.wol_irq = pdev->irq;
> This seems redundant. If res.wol_irq matches res_irq it won't be used
> (see stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and stmmac_request_irq_single()).
> What about dropping it?

Okay, actually, it was removed by subsequent patches.


Thanks,

Yanteng

>
> -Serge(y)
>
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	ret = stmmac_dvr_probe(&pdev->dev, plat, &res);
>> -- 
>> 2.31.4
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ