[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1854a99-d0fd-4b96-875a-ef9be2b96f04@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:08:03 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, joabreu@...opsys.com, Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com,
chenhuacai@...ngson.cn, linux@...linux.org.uk, guyinggang@...ngson.cn,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, chris.chenfeiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 03/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-loongson: Add full
PCI support
在 2024/2/6 00:49, Serge Semin 写道:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:43:23PM +0800, Yanteng Si wrote:
>> Current dwmac-loongson only support LS2K in the "probed with PCI and
>> configured with DT" manner. Add LS7A support on which the devices are
>> fully PCI (non-DT).
> Please add to the commit log more details of what LS7A is like and
> bind that description to the changes below like the interface
> settings, ref and PTP clock settings, etc. What is the difference
> between LS2K and LS7A?
OK,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c | 79 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> index e2dcb339b8b0..979c9b6dab3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ struct stmmac_pci_info {
>> static void loongson_default_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
>> {
>> + /* Get bus_id, this can be overloaded later */
>> + plat->bus_id = (pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus) << 16) |
>> + PCI_DEVID(pdev->bus->number, pdev->devfn);
>> +
>> plat->clk_csr = 2; /* clk_csr_i = 20-35MHz & MDC = clk_csr_i/16 */
>> plat->has_gmac = 1;
>> plat->force_sf_dma_mode = 1;
>> @@ -51,10 +55,14 @@ static int loongson_gmac_data(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> plat->mdio_bus_data->phy_mask = 0;
>>
>> plat->phy_addr = -1;
>> + plat->phy_interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID;
>>
>> plat->dma_cfg->pbl = 32;
>> plat->dma_cfg->pblx8 = true;
>>
>> + plat->clk_ref_rate = 125000000;
>> + plat->clk_ptp_rate = 125000000;
>> +
> Is this compatible with the LS2K GMAC?
Of course!
>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -71,13 +79,6 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> struct stmmac_resources res;
>> struct device_node *np;
>>
>> - np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>> -
>> - if (!np) {
>> - pr_info("dwmac_loongson_pci: No OF node\n");
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> - }
>> -
>> plat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!plat)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> if (!plat->dma_cfg)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>> plat->mdio_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
>> if (plat->mdio_node) {
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Found MDIO subnode\n");
> Shouldn't mdio_node setup being done under the "if (np)" clause?
Yes, they will be moved there.
>
>> @@ -123,41 +125,48 @@ static int loongson_dwmac_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_disable_device;
>>
>> - bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "ethernet");
>> - if (bus_id >= 0)
>> - plat->bus_id = bus_id;
>> + if (np) {
>> + bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "ethernet");
>> + if (bus_id >= 0)
>> + plat->bus_id = bus_id;
>>
>> - phy_mode = device_get_phy_mode(&pdev->dev);
>> - if (phy_mode < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "phy_mode not found\n");
>> - ret = phy_mode;
>> - goto err_disable_device;
>> + phy_mode = device_get_phy_mode(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (phy_mode < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "phy_mode not found\n");
>> + ret = phy_mode;
>> + goto err_disable_device;
>> + }
>> + plat->phy_interface = phy_mode;
>> }
> Please collect all OF-specific code in the same "if (np)" clause if
> possible.
OK,
>
>>
>> - plat->phy_interface = phy_mode; np = dev_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>> -
>> pci_enable_msi(pdev);
>> memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res));
>> res.addr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[0];
>>
>> - res.irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "macirq");
>> - if (res.irq < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ macirq not found\n");
>> - ret = -ENODEV;
>> - goto err_disable_msi;
>> - }
>> -
>> - res.wol_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_wake_irq");
>> - if (res.wol_irq < 0) {
>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_wake_irq not found, using macirq\n");
>> - res.wol_irq = res.irq;
>> - }
>> -
>> - res.lpi_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_lpi");
>> - if (res.lpi_irq < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>> - ret = -ENODEV;
>> - goto err_disable_msi;
>> + if (np) {
>> + res.irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "macirq");
>> + if (res.irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ macirq not found\n");
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto err_disable_msi;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res.wol_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_wake_irq");
>> + if (res.wol_irq < 0) {
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
>> + "IRQ eth_wake_irq not found, using macirq\n");
>> + res.wol_irq = res.irq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res.lpi_irq = of_irq_get_byname(np, "eth_lpi");
>> + if (res.lpi_irq < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto err_disable_msi;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + res.irq = pdev->irq;
>> + res.wol_irq = pdev->irq;
> This seems redundant. If res.wol_irq matches res_irq it won't be used
> (see stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and stmmac_request_irq_single()).
> What about dropping it?
Okay, actually, it was removed by subsequent patches.
Thanks,
Yanteng
>
> -Serge(y)
>
>> }
>>
>> ret = stmmac_dvr_probe(&pdev->dev, plat, &res);
>> --
>> 2.31.4
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists