[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221102851.GA352018@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:28:51 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] net: qlogic: qede: Use linkmode helpers
for EEE
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:45:28PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > + unsupp = linkmode_andnot(tmp, edata->advertised, supported);
> >
> > nit: Given the types involved, I might have written this as:
> >
> > unsupp = !!linkmode_andnot(tmp, edata->advertised, supported);
>
> linkmode_andnot() calls bitmap_andnot():
>
> static inline bool bitmap_andnot(unsigned long *dst, const unsigned long *src1,
> const unsigned long *src2, unsigned int nbits)
>
> It already returns a bool, so there is no need to force an int to bool
> conversion using !!.
Good point, sorry for missing that.
I assume there is a reason that the return type of
linkmode_andnot is not bool.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists