netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: implement lockless setsockopt(SO_PEEK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <170851502654.15341.9370041553811583230.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:30:26 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
 willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, daan.j.demeyer@...il.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
 martin.lau@...nel.org, dsahern@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: implement lockless setsockopt(SO_PEEK_OFF)

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:12:20 +0000 you wrote:
> syzbot reported a lockdep violation [1] involving af_unix
> support of SO_PEEK_OFF.
> 
> Since SO_PEEK_OFF is inherently not thread safe (it uses a per-socket
> sk_peek_off field), there is really no point to enforce a pointless
> thread safety in the kernel.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: implement lockless setsockopt(SO_PEEK_OFF)
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/56667da7399e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html