[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221004949.2561972-11-alan.brady@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:49:49 -0800
From: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/10 iwl-next] idpf: remove dealloc vector msg err in idpf_intr_rel
This error message is at best not really helpful and at worst
misleading. If we're here in idpf_intr_rel we're likely trying to do
remove or reset. If we're in reset, this message will fail because we
lose the virtchnl on reset and HW is going to clean up those resources
regardless in that case. If we're in remove and we get an error here,
we're going to reset the device at the end of remove anyway so not a big
deal. Just remove this message it's not useful.
Tested-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Brady <alan.brady@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c
index 1aae6963628b..1e30ef98cd68 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_lib.c
@@ -78,19 +78,12 @@ static void idpf_mb_intr_rel_irq(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
*/
void idpf_intr_rel(struct idpf_adapter *adapter)
{
- int err;
-
if (!adapter->msix_entries)
return;
idpf_mb_intr_rel_irq(adapter);
pci_free_irq_vectors(adapter->pdev);
-
- err = idpf_send_dealloc_vectors_msg(adapter);
- if (err)
- dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
- "Failed to deallocate vectors: %d\n", err);
-
+ idpf_send_dealloc_vectors_msg(adapter);
idpf_deinit_vector_stack(adapter);
kfree(adapter->msix_entries);
adapter->msix_entries = NULL;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists