[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221172032.78737-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:00:10 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] net: Provide SMP threads for backlog NAPI
The RPS code and "deferred skb free" both send IPI/ function call
to a remote CPU in which a softirq is raised. This leads to a warning on
PREEMPT_RT because raising softiqrs from function call led to undesired
behaviour in the past. I had duct tape in RT for the "deferred skb free"
and Wander Lairson Costa reported the RPS case.
This series only provides support for SMP threads for backlog NAPI, I
did not attach a patch to make it default and remove the IPI related
code to avoid confusion. I can post it for reference it asked.
The RedHat performance team was so kind to provide some testing here.
The series (with the IPI code removed) has been tested and no regression
vs without the series has been found. For testing iperf3 was used on 25G
interface, provided by mlx5, ix40e or ice driver and RPS was enabled. I
can provide the individual test results if needed.
Changes:
- v1…v2 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230929162121.1822900-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
- Patch #1 is new. It ensures that NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED is always
set (instead conditional based on task state) and the smboot thread
logic relies on this bit now. In v1 NAPI_STATE_SCHED was used but is
racy.
- The defer list clean up is split out and also relies on
NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED. This fixes a different race.
- RFC…v1 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230814093528.117342-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
- Patch #2 has been removed. Removing the warning is still an option.
- There are two patches in the series:
- Patch #1 always creates backlog threads
- Patch #2 creates the backlog threads if requested at boot time,
mandatory on PREEMPT_RT.
So it is either or and I wanted to show how both look like.
- The kernel test robot reported a performance regression with
loopback (stress-ng --udp X --udp-ops Y) against the RFC version.
The regression is now avoided by using local-NAPI if backlog
processing is requested on the local CPU.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists