netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/9] lib: memcpy_kunit: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240221210534.eeodh3qxopgp3dhy@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:05:34 +0000
From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
	Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@....com>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@...il.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthur.grillo@....br>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] lib: memcpy_kunit: Fix an invalid format specifier
 in an assertion msg

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:16PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The 'i' passed as an assertion message is a size_t, so should use '%zu',
> not '%d'.
>
> This was found by annotating the _MSG() variants of KUnit's assertions
> to let gcc validate the format strings.
>
> Fixes: bb95ebbe89a7 ("lib: Introduce CONFIG_MEMCPY_KUNIT_TEST")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
>  lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
> index 440aee705ccc..30e00ef0bf2e 100644
> --- a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct some_bytes {
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32);	\
>  	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) {	\
>  		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \
> -			"line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \
> +			"line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %zu (saw 0x%02x)\n", \
>  			__LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]);	\
>  	}	\
>  } while (0)
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct some_bytes {
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \
>  	for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) {	\
>  		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \
> -			"line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \
> +			"line %d: %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x)\n", \
>  			__LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \
>  	}	\
>  	kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n");	\
> --
> 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
>

Thanks
Justin