[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52fba837-989b-4213-8af7-f02cd8cb48c8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:21:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/18] PCI/pwrctl: add a power control driver for
WCN7850
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:22:50AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:44 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Yes, that's the theory - I just question if it actually does something
> > useful in practice. Between regulators getting more and more able to
> > figure out mode switching autonomously based on load monitoring and them
> > getting more efficient it's become very unclear if this actually
> > accomplishes anything, the only usage is the Qualcomm stuff and that's
> > all really unsophisticated and has an air of something that's being
> > cut'n'pasted forwards rather than delivering practical results. There
> > is some value at ultra low loads, but that's more for suspend modes than
> > for actual use.
> Removing it would be out of scope for this series and I don't really
> want to introduce any undefined behavior when doing a big development
> like that. I'll think about it separately.
This is new code?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists