lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c5c69f8-b7c1-6de7-e22a-5bb267f5562d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:44:23 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>,
 stephen@...workplumber.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Chittim, Madhu" <madhu.chittim@...el.com>,
 "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
 amritha.nambiar@...el.com, Jan Sokolowski <jan.sokolowski@...el.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC]: raw packet filtering via tc-flower

On 23/02/2024 13:32, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> u32 has a DSL that deals with parsing as well, which includes dealing
> with variable packet offsets etc. That is a necessary ingredient if
> you want to do pragmatic parsing (example how do you point to TCP
> ports if the IP header has options etc).

My understanding (Ahmed can correct me) is that the proposed raw
 filtering here would not support variable packet offsets at all.
That is precisely why I consider it a narrow hack for specialised
 use-cases and thus oppose its addition to cls_flower.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ