[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2wmqvqpex.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:29:58 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko
<jiri@...dia.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 01/14] rtnetlink: prepare nla_put_iflink()
to run under RCU
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> writes:
> We want to be able to run rtnl_fill_ifinfo() under RCU protection
> instead of RTNL in the future.
>
> This patch prepares dev_get_iflink() and nla_put_iflink()
> to run either with RTNL or RCU held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
I notice that several of the *_get_iflink() implementations are wrapped
with rcu_read_lock()/unlock() and many are not. Shouldn't this be done
consistently for all?
e.g.
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> index 7a5be705d71830d5bb3aa26a96a4463df03883a4..6f2a688fccbfb02ae7bdf3d55cca0e77fa9b56b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> @@ -1272,10 +1272,10 @@ static int ipoib_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* parent interface */
> if (!test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_SUBINTERFACE, &priv->flags))
> - return dev->ifindex;
> + return READ_ONCE(dev->ifindex);
>
> /* child/vlan interface */
> - return priv->parent->ifindex;
> + return READ_ONCE(priv->parent->ifindex);
> }
>
> static u32 ipoib_addr_hash(struct ipoib_neigh_hash *htbl, u8 *daddr)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> index 98c669ad5141479b509ee924ddba3da6bca554cd..f7fabba707ea640cab8863e63bb19294e333ba2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/vxcan.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int vxcan_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev)
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> peer = rcu_dereference(priv->peer);
> - iflink = peer ? peer->ifindex : 0;
> + iflink = peer ? READ_ONCE(peer->ifindex) : 0;
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return iflink;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists