[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240223214003.17369-8-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:39:56 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 07/14] af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor for embryo socket.
To garbage collect inflight AF_UNIX sockets, we must define the
cyclic reference appropriately. This is a bit tricky if the loop
consists of embryo sockets.
Suppose that the fd of AF_UNIX socket A is passed to D and the fd B
to C and that C and D are embryo sockets of A and B, respectively.
It may appear that there are two separate graphs, A (-> D) and
B (-> C), but this is not correct.
A --. .-- B
X
C <-' `-> D
Now, D holds A's refcount, and C has B's refcount, so unix_release()
will never be called for A and B when we close() them. However, no
one can call close() for D and C to free skbs holding refcounts of A
and B because C/D is in A/B's receive queue, which should have been
purged by unix_release() for A and B.
So, here's another type of cyclic reference. When a fd of an AF_UNIX
socket is passed to an embryo socket, the reference is indirectly held
by its parent listening socket.
.-> A .-> B
| `- sk_receive_queue | `- sk_receive_queue
| `- skb | `- skb
| `- sk == C | `- sk == D
| `- sk_receive_queue | `- sk_receive_queue
| `- skb +---------' `- skb +--.
| |
`----------------------------------------------------------'
Technically, the graph must be denoted as A <-> B instead of A (-> D)
and B (-> C) to find such a cyclic reference without touching each
socket's receive queue.
.-> A --. .-- B <-.
| X | == A <-> B
`-- C <-' `-> D --'
We apply this fixup during GC by fetching the real successor by
unix_edge_successor().
When we call accept(), we clear unix_sock.listener under unix_gc_lock
not to confuse GC.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
include/net/af_unix.h | 1 +
net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +-
net/unix/garbage.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
index dc7469191195..414463803b7e 100644
--- a/include/net/af_unix.h
+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ void unix_inflight(struct user_struct *user, struct file *fp);
void unix_notinflight(struct user_struct *user, struct file *fp);
void unix_add_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl, struct unix_sock *receiver);
void unix_del_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
+void unix_update_edges(struct unix_sock *receiver);
int unix_prepare_fpl(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
void unix_destroy_fpl(struct scm_fp_list *fpl);
void unix_gc(void);
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index af74e7ebc35a..ae77e2dc0dae 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@ static int unix_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags,
}
tsk = skb->sk;
- unix_sk(tsk)->listener = NULL;
+ unix_update_edges(unix_sk(tsk));
skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
wake_up_interruptible(&unix_sk(sk)->peer_wait);
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 7e90663513f9..a21dbbbd9bc7 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -101,6 +101,14 @@ struct unix_sock *unix_get_socket(struct file *filp)
return NULL;
}
+static struct unix_vertex *unix_edge_successor(struct unix_edge *edge)
+{
+ if (edge->successor->listener)
+ return unix_sk(edge->successor->listener)->vertex;
+
+ return edge->successor->vertex;
+}
+
static LIST_HEAD(unix_unvisited_vertices);
enum unix_vertex_index {
@@ -213,6 +221,13 @@ void unix_del_edges(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
fpl->inflight = false;
}
+void unix_update_edges(struct unix_sock *receiver)
+{
+ spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+ receiver->listener = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
+}
+
int unix_prepare_fpl(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
{
struct unix_vertex *vertex;
@@ -268,7 +283,7 @@ static void __unix_walk_scc(struct unix_vertex *vertex)
list_add(&vertex->scc_entry, &vertex_stack);
list_for_each_entry(edge, &vertex->edges, vertex_entry) {
- struct unix_vertex *next_vertex = edge->successor->vertex;
+ struct unix_vertex *next_vertex = unix_edge_successor(edge);
if (!next_vertex)
continue;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists