[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240223160259.22c61d1e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:02:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: mic@...ikod.net
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
jakub@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support
using xfail
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:22:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all
> tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they
> expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return
> codes to pass/fail/skip.
>
> Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes
> under kselftest_harness.
>
> Merge plan is to put it on top of -rc4 and merge into net-next.
> That way others should be able to pull the patches without
> any networking changes.
Hi Mickaƫl,
would you be able to take a look at those changes? landlock seems to be
the sole user of the "no_print" functionality in the selftest harness.
If the patches look good I'll create a branch based on Linus's tree
so that anyone interested can pull the changes in..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists