[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240223180257.5d828020@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:02:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>, Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] net: Use backlog-NAPI to clean up the
defer_list.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:00:13 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> + if (use_backlog_threads()) {
> + rps_lock_irqsave(sd, &flags);
> +
> + if (!__test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &sd->backlog.state))
> + napi_schedule_rps(sd);
Why are you calling napi_schedule_rps() here?
Just do __napi_schedule_irqoff(&sd->backlog);
Then you can move the special case inside napi_schedule_rps()
into the if (sd != mysd) block.
> + rps_unlock_irq_restore(sd, &flags);
Also not sure if the lock helpers should still be called RPS since they
also protect state on non-RPS configs now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists