lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:22:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, opendmb@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
 hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, rafal@...ecki.pl,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next resend 2/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,asp-v2.0: Add
 asp-v2.2

On 23/02/2024 23:24, Justin Chen wrote:
> Add support for ASP 2.2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
> index 75d8138298fb..5a345f03de17 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ description: Broadcom Ethernet controller first introduced with 72165
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - brcm,bcm74165-asp
> +          - const: brcm,asp-v2.2
>        - items:
>            - enum:
>                - brcm,bcm74165-asp

Hm, this confuses me: why do you have same SoC with three different
versions of the same block?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ