netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240226085305.67ad776a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:53:05 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
 jakub@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] selftests: kselftest_harness: support
 using xfail

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:27:34 +0100 Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > would you be able to take a look at those changes? landlock seems to be
> > the sole user of the "no_print" functionality in the selftest harness.
> > If the patches look good I'll create a branch based on Linus's tree
> > so that anyone interested can pull the changes in..  
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> I missed your patches before this series.  I just sent two patches to
> clean things up before you change them.  This should simplify your
> patches and improve the overall maintenance.  I'd appreciate if you
> rebase on top of them.

Nice! vfork() is a bit scary so I'll give people a couple of days to
review and then post a combined+rebased series.