netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] virtio_net: Support RX hash XDP hint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65dcf7a775437_20e0a2087f@john.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:42:15 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, 
 Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
 mst@...hat.com, 
 hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com, 
 davem@...emloft.net, 
 edumazet@...gle.com, 
 kuba@...nel.org, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
 john.fastabend@...il.com, 
 daniel@...earbox.net, 
 ast@...nel.org, 
 Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] virtio_net: Support RX hash XDP hint

Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:42 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 13:57:25 +0100, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 18:39 +0800, Liang Chen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:27 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 10:54 +0800, Liang Chen wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:44 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 10:56 +0800, Liang Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:20 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 02/02/2024 13.11, Liang Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -1033,6 +1039,16 @@ static void put_xdp_frags(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > > > > > > > > >       }
> > > > > > > > > >   }
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +static void virtnet_xdp_save_rx_hash(struct virtnet_xdp_buff *virtnet_xdp,
> > > > > > > > > > +                                  struct net_device *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > +                                  struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash *hdr_hash)
> > > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > > +     if (dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH) {
> > > > > > > > > > +             virtnet_xdp->hash_value = hdr_hash->hash_value;
> > > > > > > > > > +             virtnet_xdp->hash_report = hdr_hash->hash_report;
> > > > > > > > > > +     }
> > > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to store a pointer to hdr_hash in virtnet_xdp_buff,
> > > > > > > > > with the purpose of delaying extracting this, until and only if XDP
> > > > > > > > > bpf_prog calls the kfunc?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That seems to be the way v1 works,
> > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122102256.261374-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com/
> > > > > > > > . But it was pointed out that the inline header may be overwritten by
> > > > > > > > the xdp prog, so the hash is copied out to maintain its integrity.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why? isn't XDP supposed to get write access only to the pkt
> > > > > > > contents/buffer?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Normally, an XDP program accesses only the packet data. However,
> > > > > > there's also an XDP RX Metadata area, referenced by the data_meta
> > > > > > pointer. This pointer can be adjusted with bpf_xdp_adjust_meta to
> > > > > > point somewhere ahead of the data buffer, thereby granting the XDP
> > > > > > program access to the virtio header located immediately before the
> > > > >
> > > > > AFAICS bpf_xdp_adjust_meta() does not allow moving the meta_data before
> > > > > xdp->data_hard_start:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/core/filter.c#L4210
> > > > >
> > > > > and virtio net set such field after the virtio_net_hdr:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/virtio_net.c#L1218
> > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/virtio_net.c#L1420
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see how the virtio hdr could be touched? Possibly even more
> > > > > important: if such thing is possible, I think is should be somewhat
> > > > > denied (for the same reason an H/W nic should prevent XDP from
> > > > > modifying its own buffer descriptor).
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for highlighting this concern. The header layout differs
> > > > slightly between small and mergeable mode. Taking 'mergeable mode' as
> > > > an example, after calling xdp_prepare_buff the layout of xdp_buff
> > > > would be as depicted in the diagram below,
> > > >
> > > >                       buf
> > > >                        |
> > > >                        v
> > > >         +--------------+--------------+-------------+
> > > >         | xdp headroom | virtio header| packet      |
> > > >         | (256 bytes)  | (20 bytes)   | content     |
> > > >         +--------------+--------------+-------------+
> > > >         ^                             ^
> > > >         |                             |
> > > >  data_hard_start                    data
> > > >                                   data_meta
> > > >
> > > > If 'bpf_xdp_adjust_meta' repositions the 'data_meta' pointer a little
> > > > towards 'data_hard_start', it would point to the inline header, thus
> > > > potentially allowing the XDP program to access the inline header.

Fairly late to the thread sorry. Given above layout does it make sense to
just delay extraction to the kfunc as suggested above? Sure the XDP program
could smash the entry in virtio header, but this is already the case for
anything else there. A program writing over the virtio header is likely
buggy anyways. Worse that might happen is bad rss values and mappings?

I like seeing more use cases for the hints though.

Thanks!
John