[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m27ciroaur.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:04:12 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, jiri@...nulli.us, sdf@...gle.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] tools: ynl: stop using libmnl
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:26:33 +0000 Donald Hunter wrote:
>> Is the absence of buffer bounds checking intentional, i.e. relying on libasan?
>
> In ynl.c or the generated code?
I'm looking at ynl_attr_nest_start() and ynl_attr_put*() in ynl-priv.h
and there's no checks for buffer overrun. It is admittedly a big
buffer, with rx following tx, but still.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists