[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd3iWJut1tMHRIdU@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:23:36 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] virtio_net: virtnet_send_command
supports command-specific-result
The patch subject should clearly indicate what should be changed,
something like this:
Subject: virtio_net: add support for command-specific-result in virtnet_send_command()
Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 09:02:59AM CET, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
>As the spec https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/42f389989823039724f95bbbd243291ab0064f82
>
>The virtnet cvq supports to get result from the device.
>This commit implement this.
Again, be imperative to the codebase clearly saying what it should
change. Much easier to read and understand the patch description then.
The code looks ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists