netdev - [PATCH net-next] inet6: expand rcu_read_lock() scope in inet6_dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240227222259.4081489-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:22:59 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>, 
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] inet6: expand rcu_read_lock() scope in inet6_dump_addr()

I missed that inet6_dump_addr() is calling in6_dump_addrs()
from two points.

First one under RTNL protection, and second one under rcu_read_lock().

Since we want to remove RTNL use from inet6_dump_addr() very soon,
no longer assume in6_dump_addrs() is protected by RTNL (even
if this is still the case).

Use rcu_read_lock() earlier to fix this lockdep splat:

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.8.0-rc5-syzkaller-01618-gf8cbf6bde4c8 #0 Not tainted

net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5317 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
3 locks held by syz-executor.2/8834:
  #0: ffff88802f554678 (nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __netlink_dump_start+0x119/0x780 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2338
  #1: ffffffff8f377a88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0x676/0xda0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2265
  #2: ffff88807e5f0580 (&ndev->lock){++--}-{2:2}, at: in6_dump_addrs+0xb8/0x1de0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5279

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8834 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-syzkaller-01618-gf8cbf6bde4c8 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
  dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2e0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
  lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x220/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6712
  in6_dump_addrs+0x1b47/0x1de0 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5317
  inet6_dump_addr+0x1597/0x1690 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5428
  netlink_dump+0x6a6/0xda0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2266
  __netlink_dump_start+0x59d/0x780 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2374
  netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:340 [inline]
  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xcf7/0x10d0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6555
  netlink_rcv_skb+0x1e3/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2547
  netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline]
  netlink_unicast+0x7ea/0x980 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361
  netlink_sendmsg+0x8e0/0xcb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1902
  sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
  __sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
  ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2584
  ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2638 [inline]
  __sys_sendmsg+0x2b0/0x3a0 net/socket.c:2667

Fixes: c3718936ec47 ("ipv6: anycast: complete RCU handling of struct ifacaddr6")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index e27069ad938ca68d758ef956b8c36cb85697eeb5..953a95898e4adce877d153f73ce4ec4a127e60e7 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -5300,9 +5300,9 @@ static int in6_dump_addrs(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		fillargs->event = RTM_GETMULTICAST;
 
 		/* multicast address */
-		for (ifmca = rtnl_dereference(idev->mc_list);
+		for (ifmca = rcu_dereference(idev->mc_list);
 		     ifmca;
-		     ifmca = rtnl_dereference(ifmca->next), ip_idx++) {
+		     ifmca = rcu_dereference(ifmca->next), ip_idx++) {
 			if (ip_idx < s_ip_idx)
 				continue;
 			err = inet6_fill_ifmcaddr(skb, ifmca, fillargs);
@@ -5410,6 +5410,7 @@ static int inet6_dump_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
 	s_idx = idx = cb->args[1];
 	s_ip_idx = cb->args[2];
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (cb->strict_check) {
 		err = inet6_valid_dump_ifaddr_req(nlh, &fillargs, &tgt_net,
 						  skb->sk, cb);
@@ -5434,7 +5435,6 @@ static int inet6_dump_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
 		}
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	cb->seq = inet6_base_seq(tgt_net);
 	for (h = s_h; h < NETDEV_HASHENTRIES; h++, s_idx = 0) {
 		idx = 0;
@@ -5456,10 +5456,10 @@ static int inet6_dump_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
 		}
 	}
 done:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	cb->args[0] = h;
 	cb->args[1] = idx;
 put_tgt_net:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (fillargs.netnsid >= 0)
 		put_net(tgt_net);
 
-- 
2.44.0.rc1.240.g4c46232300-goog