netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: allocate the fclone in the current NUMA node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19162784-e267-4531-9906-bac3de7cf6ac@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:30:46 +0800
From: Shijie Huang <shijie@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
 Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, patches@...erecomputing.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 horms@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
 linyunsheng@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, cl@...amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: allocate the fclone in the current NUMA node


在 2024/2/26 18:10, Alexander Lobakin 写道:
> __alloc_skb() and skb clones aren't anyway something very hotpathish, do
> you have any particular perf numbers and/or usecases where %NUMA_NO_NODE
> really hurts?

 From the memcached test, I do not see really performance hurts.


Thanks

Huang Shijie