netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next resend 2/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,asp-v2.0: Add asp-v2.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:07:02 -0800
From: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, opendmb@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
 hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, rafal@...ecki.pl,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next resend 2/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,asp-v2.0: Add
 asp-v2.2



On 2/26/2024 10:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/02/2024 20:42, Justin Chen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/24/24 2:22 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2024 23:24, Justin Chen wrote:
>>>> Add support for ASP 2.2.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
>>>> index 75d8138298fb..5a345f03de17 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,asp-v2.0.yaml
>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ description: Broadcom Ethernet controller first introduced with 72165
>>>>    properties:
>>>>      compatible:
>>>>        oneOf:
>>>> +      - items:
>>>> +          - enum:
>>>> +              - brcm,bcm74165-asp
>>>> +          - const: brcm,asp-v2.2
>>>>          - items:
>>>>              - enum:
>>>>                  - brcm,bcm74165-asp
>>>
>>> Hm, this confuses me: why do you have same SoC with three different
>>> versions of the same block?
>>>
>>
>> bcm72165 -> asp-v2.0
>> bcm74165 -> asp-v2.1
>> Are two different SoCs.
> 
> Ah, right, existing bindings has two SoCs.
> 
>>
>> The entry I just added is
>> bcm74165 -> asp-v2.2
>> This is a SoC minor revision. Maybe it should bcm74165b0-asp instead?
>> Not sure what the protocol is.
> 
> So still the confusion - same SoC with different IP blocks. That's
> totally opposite of what we expect: same version of IP block used in
> multiple SoCs.
> 
>

Agreed. Unfortunately what we expect is not always what comes to fruition...

Thinking about it again, I prefer bcm74165b0-asp. Otherwise it doesn't 
properly describe the hardware as we do not have one SoC with two 
different IP blocks.

Thanks,
Justin

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4206 bytes)