[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240228094541.GA292522@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:45:41 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
opendmb@...il.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
rafal@...ecki.pl, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: bcmasp: Keep buffers through power
management
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:54:53AM -0800, Justin Chen wrote:
> There is no advantage of freeing and re-allocating buffers through
> suspend and resume. This waste cycles and makes suspend/resume time
> longer. We also open ourselves to failed allocations in systems with
> heavy memory fragmentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
...
> @@ -1118,6 +1083,10 @@ static int bcmasp_open(struct net_device *dev)
>
> netif_dbg(intf, ifup, dev, "bcmasp open\n");
>
> + ret = bcmasp_alloc_buffers(intf);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
Hi Justin,
Do the resources allocated by bcmasp_alloc_buffers() need
to be released if an error occurs in bcmasp_open() below this line?
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(intf->parent->clk);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists