lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240228022420.27327-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:24:20 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <allison.henderson@...cle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <rds-devel@....oracle.com>,
	<syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 4/5] rds: tcp: Fix use-after-free of net in reqsk_timer_handler().

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:06:07 +0100
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:12 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
> >
> > syzkaller reported a warning of netns tracker [0] followed by KASAN
> > splat [1] and another ref tracker warning [1].
> >
> > syzkaller could not find a repro, but in the log, the only suspicious
> > sequence was as follows:
> >
> >   18:26:22 executing program 1:
> >   r0 = socket$inet6_mptcp(0xa, 0x1, 0x106)
> >   ...
> >   connect$inet6(r0, &(0x7f0000000080)={0xa, 0x4001, 0x0, @loopback}, 0x1c) (async)
> >
> > The notable thing here is 0x4001 in connect(), which is RDS_TCP_PORT.
> >
> > So, the scenario would be:
> >
> >   1. unshare(CLONE_NEWNET) creates a per netns tcp listener in
> >       rds_tcp_listen_init().
> >   2. syz-executor connect()s to it and creates a reqsk.
> >   3. syz-executor exit()s immediately.
> >   4. netns is dismantled.  [0]
> >   5. reqsk timer is fired, and UAF happens while freeing reqsk.  [1]
> >   6. listener is freed after RCU grace period.  [2]
> >
> > Basically, reqsk assumes that the listener guarantees netns safety
> > until all reqsk timers are expired by holding the listener's refcount.
> > However, this was not the case for kernel sockets.
> >
> > Commit 740ea3c4a0b2 ("tcp: Clean up kernel listener's reqsk in
> > inet_twsk_purge()") fixed this issue only for per-netns ehash, but
> > the issue still exists for the global ehash.
> >
> > We can apply the same fix, but this issue is specific to RDS.
> >
> > Instead of iterating ehash and purging reqsk during netns dismantle,
> > let's hold netns refcount for the kernel listener.
> >
> >
> 
> > Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
> > Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Fixes: 467fa15356ac ("RDS-TCP: Support multiple RDS-TCP listen endpoints, one per netns.")
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> > ---
> >  net/rds/tcp_listen.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> > index 05008ce5c421..2d40e523322c 100644
> > --- a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> > +++ b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> > @@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ struct socket *rds_tcp_listen_init(struct net *net, bool isv6)
> >         int addr_len;
> >         int ret;
> >
> > -       ret = sock_create_kern(net, isv6 ? PF_INET6 : PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM,
> > -                              IPPROTO_TCP, &sock);
> > +       ret = __sock_create(net, isv6 ? PF_INET6 : PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM,
> > +                           IPPROTO_TCP, &sock, SOCKET_KERN_NET_REF);
> >         if (ret < 0) {
> >                 rdsdebug("could not create %s listener socket: %d\n",
> >                          isv6 ? "IPv6" : "IPv4", ret);
> 
> If RDS module keeps a listener alive, not attached to a user process,
> netns dismantle will never occur.
> 
> I think we have to cleanup SYN_RECV sockets in inet_twsk_purge()

Ah.. yes, __init_net ops hook must not take net ref..
I'll go that way in v3.


> 
> Yes, it removes one optimization you did.
> 
> Perhaps add a counter of all kernel sockets that were ever attached to
> a netns in order to decide to apply the optimization.
> (keeping a precise count of SYN_RECV would be too expensive)

I'll work on the follow-up for net-next after the right fix is merged.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ