[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240227185157.37355343@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:51:57 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko
<jiri@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/15] ipv6: addrconf_disable_ipv6()
optimizations
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:01:48 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> + if (p == &net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->disable_ipv6) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(*p, newf);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> if (!rtnl_trylock())
> return restart_syscall();
>
> - net = (struct net *)table->extra2;
> old = *p;
> WRITE_ONCE(*p, newf);
>
> - if (p == &net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->disable_ipv6) {
> - rtnl_unlock();
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (p == &net->ipv6.devconf_all->disable_ipv6) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(net->ipv6.devconf_dflt->disable_ipv6, newf);
Why is this line going away? We pulled up the handling of devconf_all
not devconf_dflt
> + if (p == &net->ipv6.devconf_all->disable_ipv6)
> addrconf_disable_change(net, newf);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists