[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd9Um1LHjQ6NXVlP@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:43:23 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Simplify net_dbg_ratelimited() dummy
Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:05:29PM CET, geert+renesas@...der.be wrote:
>There is no need to wrap calls to the no_printk() helper inside an
>always-false check, as no_printk() already does that internally.
>
>Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists