[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd7mFe3-kbqjGpxh@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:51:49 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fman: Use common error handling code in dtsec_init()
Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:46:57AM CET, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:14:52 +0100 Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Adjust jump targets so that a bit of exception handling can be better
>> reused at the end of this function implementation.
>
>Okay, but..
>
>> .../net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_dtsec.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>..you've added more lines than you've removed so what's the point.
To have cleaner error path? Not always lines of code is the correct
indicator of patch quality :)
>--
>pw-bot: reject
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists