netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] net: hisi_femac: add support for hisi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a9a0a85-d345-41e8-a821-d537f1ce827e@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:17:23 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>,
 Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Salil Mehta
 <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] net: hisi_femac: add support for
 hisi_femac core on Hi3798MV200

On 29/02/2024 09:14, Yang Xiwen wrote:
> On 2/29/2024 4:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/02/2024 10:02, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
>>>
>>> Register the sub MDIO bus if it is found. Also implement the internal
>>> PHY reset procedure as needed.
>>>
>>
>>
>>>  
>>> @@ -947,6 +992,7 @@ static int hisi_femac_drv_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  static const struct of_device_id hisi_femac_match[] = {
>>>  	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-femac",},
>>>  	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-femac",},
>>> +	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hi3798mv200-femac",},
>>
>> No, it does not make any sense. Why do you keep growing this table?
> 
> So do I only have to keep the generic compatible "hisilicon,hisi-femac"
> or the two SoC compatibles?

You only need to keep here fallback compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof