netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] net: wan: Add support for QMC HDLC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZeCfMfuMI4hJ54Bb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:13:53 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] net: wan: Add support for QMC HDLC

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 03:15:49PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> The QMC HDLC driver provides support for HDLC using the QMC (QUICC
> Multichannel Controller) to transfer the HDLC data.

...

+ array_size.h
+ bug.h

> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>

+ device.h
+ err.h

> +#include <linux/hdlc.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>

+ spinlock.h
+ types.h

With this fixed (below is up to you),
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

...

> +free_desc:
> +	qmc_chan_reset(qmc_hdlc->qmc_chan, QMC_CHAN_ALL);
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(qmc_hdlc->rx_descs); i++) {

I'm wondering what prevents you from doing

	while (i--) {

> +		desc = &qmc_hdlc->rx_descs[i];

> +		if (!desc->skb)
> +			continue;

...and probably get rid of this check?

> +		dma_unmap_single(qmc_hdlc->dev, desc->dma_addr, desc->dma_size,
> +				 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +		kfree_skb(desc->skb);
> +		desc->skb = NULL;
> +	}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko