[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65dfcb37844e0_ba1f8294b7@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 19:09:27 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: Modify mono_delivery_time with
clockid_delivery_time
Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>
>
> On 2/28/2024 12:14 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/28/2024 7:53 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> Abhishek Chauhan wrote:
> >>>> Bridge driver today has no support to forward the userspace timestamp
> >>>> packets and ends up resetting the timestamp. ETF qdisc checks the
> >>>> packet coming from userspace and encounters to be 0 thereby dropping
> >>>> time sensitive packets. These changes will allow userspace timestamps
> >>>> packets to be forwarded from the bridge to NIC drivers.
> >>>>
> >>>> Existing functionality of mono_delivery_time is not altered here
> >>>> instead just extended with userspace tstamp support for bridge
> >>>> forwarding path.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Changes since v1
> >>>> - Changed the commit subject as i am modifying the mono_delivery_time
> >>>> bit with clockid_delivery_time.
> >>>> - Took care of suggestion mentioned by Willem to use the same bit for
> >>>> userspace delivery time as there are no conflicts between TCP and
> >>>> SCM_TXTIME, because explicit cmsg makes no sense for TCP and only
> >>>> RAW and DGRAM sockets interprets it.
> >>>
> >>> The variable rename churn makes it hard to spot the functional
> >>> changes. Perhaps it makes sense just keep the variable name as is,
> >>> even though the "mono" is not always technically correct anymore.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I think a better approach would be to keep the variable as ease and add
> >> comments and documentation in the header file of skbuff.h like
> >> how i have done in this patch. The reason why i say this is
> >> a. We can avoid alot of code churn just to solve this basic problem of
> >> propagating timestamp through forwarding bridge path
> >> b. Re-use the same variable name and have better documentation
> >> c. Complexity will be as minimal as possible.
> >>
> >> Let me know what you think.
> >
> > Agreed
> >
>
> Okay i will make the changes accordingly.
> >>> Or else to split into two patches. One that renames the field.
> >>> And one that adds the new behavior of setting the bit for SO_TXTIME.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Regarding the sidenote. I dont see how they are using clock_id to determine
> >> if the skb->tstamp is set in monotonic. Please correct me or point me to
> >> the piece of code which is doing so.
> >
> > That's really out of scope of this series anyway
> >
>
> Sounds good. Really appreciate your review and discussion on this topic.
>
> >>
> >> I hope the check against sock_flag is a better implementation as
> >> it clearly stats and is inline with the implementation that the tstamp is
> >> coming from userspace.
> >> skb->mono_delivery_time = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME);
> >
> > Enabling the socket flag is not sufficient to configure a delivery
> > time on a packet. A transmit time must be communicated per packet
> > with cork->transmit_time. And on top of that, it is cheaper to test.
>
>
> So to re-use the same bit of mono_delivery_time. I want to set this bit
> when user-space sets the timestamps using SCM_TXTIME.
> Is it okay if i do the below when we make skb in ipv4/ipv6 and raw packets
> to ensure that bridge doesn't reset the packet tstamp or do you have a better
> suggestion to set the bit so br_forward_finish does not reset the timestamp.
>
> skb->mono_delivery_time = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME);
I already gave my suggestion.
The timestamp is passed using sockcm_cookie field transmit_time, which
is set from a control message of type SCM_TXTIME passed to sendmsg.
Right above where you wanted to add this check is where skb->tstamp is
initialized from cork->transmit_time, which got it from this field. So
clearly that is the indication that a transmit time is set. And the
field is hot in the cache.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists