netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: net: add new property st,ext-phyclk in documentation for stm32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:36:09 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>,
 "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jose Abreu
 <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: net: add new property st,ext-phyclk in
 documentation for stm32

On 29/02/2024 14:47, Christophe Roullier wrote:
> Add property st,ext-phyclk to manage cases when PHY have no cristal/quartz
> This property can be used with RMII phy without cristal 50Mhz and when we
> want to select RCC clock instead of ETH_REF_CLK
> Can be used also with RGMII phy with no cristal and we select RCC clock
> instead of ETH_CLK125
> This new property replace st,eth-clk-sel and st,eth-ref-clk-sel

You miss full stops everywhere. What I don't get is why you decided to
deprecate above - no explanation why. Also no implementation and nothing
here mentions that you document existing property, but commit msg
actually suggests adding new property. If new, then where is any user of
this in following patch?

Best regards,
Krzysztof