netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] selftests: ip_local_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wmqmkzd4.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:40:45 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, mic@...ikod.net,
 linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org, Marcelo
 Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL
 instead of SKIP

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:25 PM -05, Xin Long wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:27 PM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 04:59 PM -08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > SCTP does not support IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE and we know it,
>> > so use XFAIL instead of SKIP.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> > ---
>> >  tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c | 6 +++---
>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c
>> > index 6ebd58869a63..193b82745fd8 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c
>> > @@ -365,9 +365,6 @@ TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, late_bind)
>> >       __u32 range;
>> >       __u16 port;
>> >
>> > -     if (variant->so_protocol == IPPROTO_SCTP)
>> > -             SKIP(return, "SCTP doesn't support IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT");
>> > -
>> >       fd = socket(variant->so_domain, variant->so_type, 0);
>> >       ASSERT_GE(fd, 0) TH_LOG("socket failed");
>> >
>> > @@ -414,6 +411,9 @@ TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, late_bind)
>> >       ASSERT_TRUE(!err) TH_LOG("close failed");
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +XFAIL_ADD(ip_local_port_range, ip4_stcp, late_bind);
>> > +XFAIL_ADD(ip_local_port_range, ip6_stcp, late_bind);
>> > +
>> >  TEST_F(ip_local_port_range, get_port_range)
>> >  {
>> >       __u16 lo, hi;
>>
>> [wrt our earlier discussion off-list]
>>
>> You were right, this test succeeds if I delete SKIP for SCTP.
>> Turns out IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE works for SCTP out of the box after all.
>>
>> What I didn't notice earlier is that sctp_setsockopt() delegates to
>> ip_setsockopt() when level != SOL_SCTP.
>>
>> CC'ing Marcelo & Xin, to confirm that this isn't a problem.
> Yes, SCTP supports ip_local_port_range by calling
> inet_sk_get_local_port_range() in sctp_get_port(), similar to TCP/UDP.

Well, that's embarassing.

I see that I've updated sctp stack to use inet_sk_get_local_port_range()
in 91d0b78c5177 ("inet: Add IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE socket option").

Thanks for confirming, Xin.

It's clearly an overside on my side. That SKIP in tests should have
never been there. I will send a fixup.