[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240301093128.18722960@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:31:28 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev,
arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dpll: avoid multiple function calls to dump
netdev info
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 17:24:07 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >BTW is the empty nest if the netdev has no pin intentional?
> >
> > The user can tell if this is or is not supported by kernel easily.
Seems legit, although user can also do:
$ genl ctrl list | grep dpll
Name: dpll
> This is a high cost for hosts with hundreds of devices :/
right, a bit high cost for a relatively rare feature :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists